Probably Fishing

A New Blockchain-Enabled Economic Paradigm

· 7 min read economics decentralization governance theory

A New Blockchain-Enabled Economic Paradigm

When Satoshi Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin in 2008, few could have predicted the profound impact this technology would have on our understanding of economic organization. As Berg, Davidson, and Potts (2019) argue,“blockchain isn’t just a new digital currency or a novel approach to data management — it’s the beginning of a fundamental transformation in the institutional foundations of capitalism itself.” It’s a technological application of capitalism that removes intermediaries and therefore removes the rationale behind many policies used to manage the consequences that arise from these organizations and relationships.

At its core, blockchain is an institutional technology. It’s not just about creating digital tokens or securing data; it’s about reimagining how we coordinate economic activity. Davidson, De Filippi, and Potts (2018) describe it as “a new technology for creating and maintaining distributed economic coordination”. This shift in perspective is crucial because it moves our understanding of blockchain from a purely technical innovation to one that fundamentally alters the way economic activities are organized and governed.

Blockchains are not just marginally better than our old systems (reducing transaction costs and improving production), it’s a completely new way of coordinating peer-to-peer economic activity. It enables new forms of economic activity that previously were unachievable through organizations or institutions due to the costs outweighing the benefits.*“In other words, the impact of blockchain technology may be less about improving the efficiency of existing economic systems — such as disintermediating payments and finance — and more about expanding the scope and depth of economic governance through the evolution of new, blockchain-native coordinating institutions.”*Davidson, De Filippi, and Potts (2018)

The key to understanding blockchain’s transformative potential lies in its ability to manufacture trust. By enabling trustless interactions between parties, blockchain significantly reduces the transaction costs associated with economic coordination. Transaction costs meaning all of the costs associated with a successful transaction (laws, policies, contracts, reputation, transaction fees). This aligns with Ronald Coase’s (1937) theory of the firm, which says that “organizations exist to minimize transaction costs”. You no longer need the reputation (or cost) of a company to organize around an idea, produce goods and services, and be trusted. A decentralized and distributed ledger lowers the cost of trust and verification— removing the need to trust centralized actors (public or private) and their ledgers.

Berg, Davidson, and Potts (2019) predict two primary effects of widespread blockchain adoption: disintermediationin markets and dehierarchicalizationof organizations. These effects challenge the traditional organizational structures that have dominated industrial capitalism, they argue leading to flatter, more decentralized economic arrangements.

“Blockchain-based distributed ledger technology introduces a new category to Williamson’s ‘economic institutions of capitalism,’ which originally included markets, hierarchies, and relational contracting. This new category is a decentralized collaborative organization (DCO). A DCO is a self-governing entity that combines the coordination properties of a market, the governance characteristics of a commons, and the constitutional, legal, and monetary attributes of a nation-state. It functions as an organization, but without a hierarchical structure. It leverages token systems to coordinate distributed actions, similar to a market, yet differs in that its primary activity is production rather than exchange. Additionally, a DCO embodies the constitutional rule-of-law properties of a nation-state, with all ‘citizens’ who opt into the DCO agreeing to its rules. These rules are automatically enforced through smart contracts.” Davidson, De Filippi, and Potts (2018)

Historically, as markets grew and economic complexity increased, hierarchical governance structures emerged to manage this complexity. This trend, observed by economists like Marx and Schumpeter, led to the rise of large corporations and extensive government regulations. Blockchain technology disrupts this trajectory. By providing a mechanism for trustless coordination, it enables complex economic activities to be organized through markets and networks rather than hierarchies.

This shift towards more decentralized, market-based coordination has profound implications for economic policy. Many existing policies were designed to address issues arising from market power, hierarchical organization, and the need for public trust infrastructure. As blockchain technology alleviates these issues, it reduces the demand for such policies. Areas likely to be affected include competition policy, consumer protection laws, financial regulations, and innovation policy.

However, the transition to this new paradigm is not without challenges. Many blockchain networks start highly centralized, with founding teams or foundations retaining significant control. This creates a paradox where networks are theoretically decentralized but practically highly centralized. Poor token distribution can lead to governance risks, even in nominally decentralized systems. High concentration of stake can allow small groups to dominate decision-making processes, see the recent Compound DAO ‘attack’. While Bitcoin was intentionally created to not have any hierarchical governance structures, this is not true for your modern layer 1 and layer 2’s where teams intentionally, and often stealthily, hold control.

Here’s a short list of ways a team can retain control over a protocol while claiming it’s decentralized:

Ask yourself how these things are controlled for your favorite blockchain.

The shift from centralized to decentralized governance can occur through various means. We might see a peaceful handover, with a gradual and responsible transfer of power through established governance procedures. In more extreme cases, we could witness a revolution, with a community-driven takeover or fork of the network. In the worst-case scenario, we might see a collapse, where the sudden dissolution of central authority forces community self-organization. Networks have the unique ability to be replicated nearly infinitely, unlike traditional governments which have a limited number of trials before being thrown out of power. You can’t simply copy the United States and try out a new governance system, but you can copy the source code for a blockchain and apply new governance mechanisms. This makes the speed of trial and error in blockchain centuries faster than nation states.

Despite the challenges, true decentralization offers significant benefits. *“Centralization can be an efficient source of order and control at small scales, but as complex self-organizing systems grow, they tend to decentralize because coordination costs eventually overwhelm any centralized node, leading to fragility. While the loss of centralized control is a drawback, the advantage is that decentralized systems are more robust. However, distributed systems still require system-wide coordination, which is typically achieved through adaptation, such as the price system in a market.”*Davidson, De Filippi, and Potts (2018). Decentralized systems are more resilient to single points of failure and can foster greater innovation through market-driven development. As central control diminishes, third parties step in to fill gaps, leading to a more robust system overall.

The rise of blockchain-based economic coordination necessitates a rethinking of economic theory and policy. Blockchain networks provide a real-world laboratory for testing and refining theories of traditional economics, transaction costs, and organizational design. Policymakers will need to adapt to a world where economic coordination increasingly occurs through decentralized, programmatic mechanisms rather than traditional hierarchical structures. Moreover, blockchain’s ability to facilitate trustless, borderless transactions will accelerate global economic integration, challenging notions of nationalist economic policy.

In conclusion, blockchain technology represents a profound institutional innovation that has the potential to reshape the foundations of capitalism. By enabling new forms of economic coordination and governance, it challenges long-held assumptions about the necessity of hierarchical organizations and extensive government intervention. It also presents new challenges, like the reappearance of a central coordinator, polarization, and new ways for people to lose money. Hyper financialization comes with many side effects which we are just starting to understand.

As we move towards “capitalism after Satoshi,” we can expect to see flatter, more decentralized economic structures, reduced demand for certain types of economic policy, and new challenges in ensuring fair and efficient economic governance. This transition offers exciting possibilities for increased innovation, resilience, and economic participation, but also requires careful consideration of governance mechanisms, token economics, and the role of centralized authorities in a decentralizing world.

The journey from the current state of blockchain networks to a truly decentralized economy will be long and complicated. However, by understanding blockchain as an institutional technology and considering its broader implications for economic organization and policy, we can better navigate this transition and harness its potential for creating more efficient, equitable, and dynamic economic systems.

slowly but inevitably

Some of the most fascinating societal experiments today are occurring in blockchain communities. As we move forward, it’s crucial that we learn from historical economic understandings while embracing the unique possibilities offered by this new technology. The future of capitalism may well be determined by how successfully we navigate this transition to a more decentralized, blockchain-enabled economic paradigm.

Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism— By Davidson, De Filippi, and Potts 2018

Capitalism After Satoshi— By Berg, Davidson, and Potts 2019

The Nature of the Firm— By Coase 1937

This piece originally appeared on Medium .